Moderation versus tagging

 

Moderation and tagging are powerful tools for managing, organising, and progressing applications throughout your program.

Moderation

Moderation is used to screen applications before they proceed to reviewing. It allows you to review submissions for completeness, quality, or eligibility and decide whether they should move forward.

From the Manage workspace, you can moderate applications directly in the Applications view by marking them as "Approved" or "Rejected". Approved applications can progress to reviewing, while rejected applications are stopped from moving forward.

To learn more, see our dedicated guide: Moderation explained.

Tagging

Tagging can be used at any stage of your program and supports a wide range of workflows.

Common use cases include:

  • Grouping applications for reviewing (for example: finalists, winners, manager’s choice)
  • Progressing applications between reviewing stages
  • Communicating with applicants (for example: missing attachment, follow-up needed, etc)
  • Internal record keeping (for example: referral source, vendor, previous participant)

An application can have any number of tags applied at the same time.

To learn more, see our guide: What are tags?

Good to know

  • Moderation and tagging are available to grant managers by default.
  • Reviewers can also tag applications if their role permissions have been updated; see: How can I allow reviewers to see tags?

 

Was this article helpful?
0 out of 0 found this helpful

Articles in this section

See more